“Monks, even if bandits were to sever you savagely limb by limb with a two-handle saw, he who gave rise to a mind of hate towards them would not be carrying out my teaching” — Shakyamuni Buddha 
By guest writer Lee Clarke
The word “Ahimsa” is from the Sanskrit language and means ‘non-harm/injury’ and is commonly translated into English as “non-violence”. It is a doctrine in the four Indian religions of Buddhism, Hinduism, Jainism and Sikhism and is defined by the Encyclopaedia Britannica as “the ethical principle of not causing harm to other living things.”
Ahimsa: non-violence, a key teaching in Sutra
In Buddhist thought, Ahimsa is also an important concept, the first precept of Buddhism is to avoid doing harm to other living things. The website ‘Buddha.net’ defines the first precept as follows:
‘To undertake the training to avoid taking the life of beings. This precept applies to all living beings not just humans. All beings have a right to their lives and that right should be respected.’
Buddhism teaches us non-violence towards others; violence towards other living things is contrary to the teachings of the Buddha. Historically, Buddhists have, on the whole, adhered to this precept.
The Buddha taught us to overcome and avoid suffering. Therefore, we cannot impose suffering on others. Killing not only causes suffering for the person who is killed but also causes suffering for their family and friends who have lost their loved one. It is also the seed of future suffering, with bad karmic consequences for the killer.
Buddha taught compassion and love
The Buddha also taught us to show love and compassion to others in place of hate and violence, and not just love for our friends but equally for our enemies, or those who seek to do us harm. One cannot become enlightened without compassion; killing is the fundamental opposite of compassion. The only exception might be — in the opinions of some — a mercy killing such as euthanasia for terminally suffering beings, or defending another innocent being from harm. But when I refer to killing, I am referring principally to war, murder and killing.
Non-Violence in Buddhist Sutra
The Buddha spoke about non-violence in many sutras, some of which I list below. The Buddha taught through his activities and actions as much as through his words.
In the Dhammapada for example, the Buddha says:
“That one I call a brahmin who has put aside weapons and renounced violence towards all creatures. Such a one neither kills nor helps others to kill…That one I call a brahmin who is never hostile to those who are hostile toward him, who is attached among those who are selfish and at peace among those at war”.
A ‘Brahmin’ is a member of the highest and priestly caste of Hinduism, The Buddha rejected the caste system; what he is declaring here is that the “Superior caste” — the Brahmin — is one who doesn’t kill and isn’t hostile to anyone, rather than someone born into the caste.
There are countless passages in Sutra, where the Buddha is even more explicit — that killing is wrong even where it looks like there is no other choice.
“Monks, even if bandits were to sever you savagely limb by limb with a two-handle saw, he who gave rise to a mind of hate towards them would not be carrying out my teaching”.
This statement seems to be the most extreme form of non-violence possible. The Buddha is clearly saying here that even if someone is killing you, hating him would be contrary to the Dhamma. To many non-Buddhists and maybe even some Buddhists themselves, this seems illogical. How can one not hate — and not only that, have compassion for — someone who is hurting them, or who wants to kill them? But in order to do this, it would obviously require the highest compassion. How should Buddhists react to people such as killers?
It is clear from the teachings of the Buddha mentioned above, that Buddhists should embrace non-violence towards others and condemn killing and harming others as something terrible that will also result in bad karmic consequences for the killer.
Buddha’s pacifist action heals the serial killer
The story of Angulimala is one of the most famous in the Buddhist cannon and one of the stories I believe that we can learn most from to apply to today’s world. Angulimala became a serial murderer, killing innocent people and terrorising many others. He chopped off their fingers and made them into a necklace and thus became known as “Angulimala” (translates as Finger Necklace).
He was a wanted criminal by the state, killer of 999 people. He was someone who was viewed as irredeemable evil, with no hope that he could become better. The Buddha refused to believe this and went to talk to Angulimala, even though he was warned by almost everyone not to do so. Angulimala saw the Buddha coming and ran towards him in waving a knife. However, no matter how fast he ran, and even though the Buddha was walking at his normal pace, Angulimala couldn’t catch up to the him. He eventually called out to the Buddha to stop.
“I have stopped Angulimala, you stop too,” Buddha replied.
Angulimala asked how it was possible since the Buddha was still walking. Buddha famously replies:
“Angulimala, I have stopped forever, I abstain from violence towards living beings. But you have no restraint towards things that live. That is why I have stopped and you have not”.
Angulimala relents and realising the error of his ways, he takes refuge in Buddha, and becomes a monk. He changed his name to “Ahimsaka” (non-violent one) to reflect his new identity and change of heart.
Later, King Pasenadi looks for Angulimala, sees the Buddha and warns him about the serial killer. The Buddha then asks the king, what he would do if he saw that Angulimala had changed, abandoned violence and become a monk to which the king replies that he would be very pleased and even support Angulimala. The Buddha then shows him the newly named Ahimsaka to which the King, in shock, congratulates him and the Buddha saying:
“Venerable sir, we ourselves could not tame him with force and weapons, yet the Blessed One has tamed him without force and weapons”.
Ahimsaka’s life as a monk is far from easy. Often, when he went for alms he was attacked by people who remembered him and what he did in his former life. However, he takes all this as it comes and does not retaliate towards his attackers. The Buddha tells him that this is the result of his actions and that him being attacked is his karmic debt being paid off. Ahimsaka later became enlightened and became an arhat, after years of purifying the negative karma of his violent past.
Although the story of Angulimala teaches us many things, its main point is that no one is inherently evil and that no one is beyond redemption. The Buddha challenges someone who practices extreme violence with non-violence and wins. As the King admits, his armies had not been able to beat Angulimala with violence but the Buddha had done it with compassion. As Indian Peace Activist Satish Kumar writes:
“The real challenge is to talk to those who are violent, those who disagree, those who oppose and who intend to harm. External violence is only a symptom, a manifestation of some deeper cause. Only in dialogue can the perpetrators of violence and the victims of violence discover its root cause. And find ways to heal the discord.”
From this story of Angulimala — and many other similar stories — it is clear that Buddhists must avoid killing and creating suffering. Equally, we should not hate someone who creates our suffering. We might object and disagree with the negative action, but we should view all sentient beings as redeemable.
Because of these teachings, for example, (in my opinion) Buddhists should also be against the death penalty because it goes against the principle of Ahimsa. I, as a Buddhist, of course think that criminals and wrong-doers should be imprisoned to pay for their crimes, in the same way that Angulimala had to pay for his. Some criminals end up being forgiven by the families of their victims and end up making up for their actions. They must have at least the chance to do this and from a Buddhist perspective, repay their karmic debt.
What to do about war and soldiers?
The Dalai Lama wrote:
“Of course, war and the large military establishments are the greatest sources of violence in the world. Whether their purpose is defensive or offensive, these vast powerful organizations exist solely to kill human beings. We should think carefully about the reality of war. Most of us have been conditioned to regard military combat as exciting and glamorous — an opportunity for men to prove their competence and courage. Since armies are legal, we feel that war is acceptable; in general, nobody feels that war is criminal or that accepting it is criminal attitude. In fact, we have been brainwashed. War is neither glamorous nor attractive. It is monstrous. Its very nature is one of tragedy and suffering.”
Buddhists are generally opposed to war; it goes against the fundamental teachings of Buddhism and the first precept. However, Buddhists are against the practice of war — not against the soldiers fighting in it.
As the Dalai Lama also says later on, the vast majority of soldiers join to defend the country, or establish themselves in a good career — not to kill. In short, soldiers join with good intentions. Therefore, it is unacceptable to claim that soldiers are somehow responsible for murder. Buddhists are against killing and war — not the people fighting the wars.
Non violence is still an action — with positive karmic results
Why is this concept so important? Because, refraining from killing isn’t enough. Reducing suffering of others also requires “action” — karma in Sanskrit. If we are to decrease suffering, we cannot let injustice continue unopposed. Therefore, non-violent resistance against oppressors, aligns best with Buddhist teachings. In the sixties, this might result in a “sit in protest” against war, or the civil rights movement. Today, we might think of the Occupy movement.
A recent study by Chenoweth and Stephan actually indicates that non-violent resistance is more effective than violent revolution. Non-violent revolution was effective in 60% of cases in comparison with violent revolution which was only effective 23% of the time in the cases studied. 
Ahimsa has been a part of Buddhist tradition since ancient times. In modern times, Ghandi made the concept famous.
Ahimsa is one of the greatest gifts from India to the rest of the world taught by the Buddha, Mahavira of the Jains, Guru Nanak of the Sikhs and the ancient sages of the Hindu tradition.
Guest contributor to Buddha Weekly Lee Clark: “I’m a Buddhist, Quaker, Humanist, existentialist and pacifist. Budding professor of religion. Love many subjects, bilingual third year uni student.” On Twitter>>
 Editors of Encyclopedia Britannica ‘Ahimsa’ at https://www.britannica.com/topic/ahimsa [Accsessed 21st April 2018]
 Buddha.net, ‘Buddhist Ethics’ at https://www.buddhanet.net/e-learning/budethics.htm [Accsessed 21st April 2018]
 Eknath Easwaran (trans) ‘The Dhammapada’ (Nilgiri Press: California,United States, 2008) P.250
 Bhikkhu Bodhi (trans) ‘The Buddha’s teachings on social and communal harmony: An Anthology of Discourses from the Pali Cannon,’ (Wisdom Publications: United States, 2016), P.60
 Bhikkhu Nanamoli and Bhikkhu Bodhi (trans) ‘The Middle Length Discourses of The Buddha: A New Translation of the Majjhima Nikaya’. (Wisdom Publications: Boston, United States, 1995), Pp. 710-717 in Donald S Lopez, Jr (editor) ‘Buddhist Scriptures’ (The Penguin Group: London, UK, 2004). Pp. 252-261
Satish Kumar ‘The Buddha and the Terrorist: The Story of Angulimala’ (Green Books Ltd: Devon, UK, 2005) Pp. 10-11
The Dalai Lama ‘The Reality of War’ at https://www.dalailama.com/messages/world-peace/the-reality-of-war [Accsessed 21st April 2018]
 Mahatma’ Gandhi, ‘The Essential Writings’ (Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2008) Pp. 316-320
 Douglas T Kenrick P h D ‘Non-violent versus violent revolutions: Which way wins?’at https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/sex-murder-and-the-meaning-life/201404/violent-versus-nonviolen revolutions-which-way-wins [Accessed 21st April 2018]
Leave a Reply